This is by far the most irritating aspect of European court of human rights-bashing. Another Library briefing paper, CBP 5353, explains how to apply to the Court. Putin critic Navalny loses appeal against ‘absurd’ jail term . v. Austria (2018) the Court upheld the ruling of the Austrian courts that imposed a fine on a woman for calling Muhammad a pedophile. the European Court of Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR or ECtHR), also known as the Strasbourg Court, is an international court of the Council of Europe which interprets the European Convention on Human Rights.The court hears applications alleging that a contracting state has breached one or more of the human rights enumerated in the Convention or its optional protocols to which a member state is a party. On 15 February 2005, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the original case had breached Article 6 (right to a fair trial) and Article 10 (right to freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights and ordered that the UK government pay Steel and Morris £57,000 in compensation. [1] The Court found that while their internment was an interference of the convention rights, it was justifiable in the circumstances; it however ruled that the practice of the five techniques and the practice of beating prisoners constituted inhumane and degrading punishment in violation of the convention, although not torture. The Court has also given rulings on various social issues such as abortion, assisted suicide, body searches, domestic slavery, adoption by homosexuals, wearing religious symbols at school, the recognition of transsexuals, the protection of journalists’ sources and even environmental issues. Europe. The Reports of Judgments and Decisions (cited in the case-law as ECHR) is an official print collection of selected judgments, decisions and advisory opinions delivered by the Court from November 1998 to December 2015. [7], In the case M.S.S. [10][11] In 2007, the Court ruled that Russia was responsible for the killings of a human rights activist Zura Bitiyeva and her family. The Convention provision which has been violated most is Article 6, as regards the right to a fair trial, then the reasonable time requirement. Recent judgments. Compendium: Article 14 Cases from the European Court of Human Rights . 41588/05. This compilation covers case-law on violence against women, domestic violence and human trafficking insofar as a violation of Article 14 is also involved (prohibition of discrimination). [19], In upholding the Turkish Constitutional Court's dissolution of The Welfare Party (Refah Partisi) for violating Turkey's principle of secularism (by calling for the re-introduction of religious law) the court held "that sharia is incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy. v. Austria ECHR case law", Refah (The Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [41340/98 41342/98 41343/98 41344/98] 13 February 2003, pp. 1 (protection of property) and Article 5 of the Convention (right to liberty and security). European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), judicial organ established in 1959 that is charged with supervising the enforcement of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950; commonly known as the European Convention on Human Rights), which was drawn up by the ,. In several cases, the Court has ruled in favour of restricting the display of symbols and clothing as religious signs. The case concerned the applicants' complaints that they were detained in high security conditions under a statutory scheme that permitted the indefinite detention of non-nationals certified by the Secretary of State as suspected of involvement in terrorism. According to the Court’s statistics, there have been 547 judgments concerning the UK up to the end of 2018. [4], In Loizidou v. Turkey the property rights of Greek-Cypriot refugees displaced by an invading Turkish army were addressed. ES v Austria (2018) (Application no. Andrea Gatti, "Freedom of Expression and Protection of Religious Peace in Europe: Considerations on E.S. US politics. The European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment on 26 February 2002. Young activists from Portugal have filed the first climate change case at the European court of human rights in Strasbourg, demanding 33 countries make … The European Court found no violation of the right to religion saying the girls had made an "ostentatious" display. Court of HR, Mosley v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 10 May 2011, application no. In the 1996 case of … Dismisses the application; 2. The cases are classified by Articles, keywords … FILE - In this Sunday, June 30, 2019 file photo, South Africa’s Caster Semenya smiles … [6], In June 2009, the Court supported the illegalization of the Basque party Batasuna (formerly Herri Batasuna) on the basis that its activity was part of the strategy of the terrorist group ETA, stating that its illegalization by Spain could be justified as necessary in a democratic society in the pursuit of the legitimate aim of preventing terrorism. In November and December 2008, the European Court dealt with Dogru v. France, and Kevanci v. France, both cases of 12-year-old Muslim girls expelled in 1999 from their schools for covering their head during phys-ed class. Strasbourg, France — The European Court of Human Rights today accepted the complaint that Senior Women for Climate Protection Switzerland and four individual plaintiffs presented last October against Switzerland, giving the case priority status. [12] Bitiyeva herself had filed a complaint against Moscow with the Court in 2000 for abuse while in detention, in then-second case from Chechnya, but she was murdered in 2003 before the ruling was issued. Since its creation in 1959, the Court has delivered more than 16,000 judgments. Finding and understanding the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights Directorate of the Jurisconsult 4/15 1. [13] Other cases ruled against Russia included the deaths (or presumed deaths after years of forced disappearance) of Ruslan Alikhadzhyev, Shakhid Baysayev, Nura Luluyeva and Khadzhi-Murat Yandiyev, the case of the indiscriminate bombing of Katyr-Yurt, and some of the deaths during the Novye Aldi massacre. The law protects the rights of journalists not to have to reveal their sources. In the case of Bivolaru and Moldovan v. France the Court held that there had been a violation of the Convention concerning Gregorian Moldovan, and no violation of … The Court therefore awarded, to the six Algerian applicants EUR 3,400, EUR 3,900, EUR 3,800, EUR 3,400, EUR 2,500 and EUR 1,700, respectively; to the stateless and Tunisian applicants EUR 3,900, each; and to the Jordanian applicant, EUR 2,800. [14], A European court case that received unprecedented level of attention in Russia and in the countries of former USSR was Kononov vs Latvia, in which the Grand Chamber ruled against USSR WWII veteran, partisan fighter Vassili Kononov, accused of war crimes in now independent Latvia. Whole-life sentences. As of 2008, the Court has been flooded by complaints from Chechnya, what the Human Rights Watch called "the last hope for the victims". The European Court of Human Rights Letts v Legal Aid Agency. The applicants were jointly awarded EUR 60,000 for legal costs. He claims it is 'swamped' by cases, becoming a 'small claims court… [18], In the case of E.S. The Human Rights cases below are here to help you write your own case summaries of as research for your law essay or dissertation: Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza EWCA Civ 1533; UKHL 30 Succession by a homosexual partner to a statutory tenancy under the Rent Act 1977 Case C-431/92 under Articles 155 and 169 of the Treaty Commission of the European Communities, applicant, v Federal Republic of Germany, defendant, supported by United Kingdom of Great Britain and Norther Ireland, intervener On those grounds, THE COURT hereby: 1. The Court maintained that the Article 10 wasn't violated by the Austrian courts, because the plaintiff's "comments were not objective, failed to provide historical background and had no intention of promoting public debate." David Cameron goes to Strasbourg today, arguing for reforms to the European court of human rights. The Court considered but declined to follow the decision of the Supreme Court of California in the landmark case of Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins (1980)). Recent decisions. In the 2001 case of Dahlab v. Switzerland, the court upheld the government's right to require a teacher, who had recently converted to Islam, to remove her headscarf given that it was a "powerful external symbol" that could "influence" young children. The European Convention on Human Rights The Court conceded that the reason given by the French administrative and judicial authorities for their decision was the applicant's “choice of lifestyle”. The European Court of Human Rights, on 30 June 2005, handed down its long awaited judgment in the case Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm v. Access on a desktop computer for the full experience and click the story links to read a bitesize summary of each case. For a more comprehensive overview on these and other subjects, Eur. The ‘right to rent’ scheme. However, that criterion implicitly yet undeniably made the applicant's homosexuality the decisive factor. In Mann Singh v. France, where a Sikh who had held driving licenses for 20 years with his picture showing him wearing a turban now had to remove his turban to continue to do so, the European Court rejected the case without a hearing. Human Rights (hereinafter: European Court) in its selected case-law on the property restitution and/or compensation measures adopted after the fall of the central and eastern European communist regimes and of principles applied by the ECtHR when examining the corresponding complaints under the European Convention on Human Rights. is published by Equinet, European Network of Equality Bodies. Case C-261/16: P Kuhna + Nagel International and others v European Commission; Case C-263/16: P Schenker v Commission; Case C-264/16: P Deutsche Bahn and others v Commission; Case C-271/16: P Panalpina World Transport (Holding) and others v Commission - judgments issued collectively on 1 February 2018. In Lautsi v. Italy the Court ruled unanimously in 2009 that crucifixes in Italian public school classes are contrary to parents' right to educate their children in line with their convictions and to children's right to freedom of religion (art. v Belgium and Greece the Court judged on 21 January 2011 that both the Greek and the Belgian governments violated the European Convention on Human Rights when applying the EU law (Dublin Regulation) on asylum seekers and were given fines to the tune of some €6,000 and €30,000, respectively. The ‘Case-law references of judgments, advisory opinions and published decisions’ is a master list of all judgments, advisory opinions and decisions that have been published or selected for publication in the Court’s official series. 3 of 2018s most significant human rights cases in a nutshell. Introduction The case-law of the European Court of Human Rights covers a wide range of subjects arising out of the application of the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights and its Protocols. Court of HR, Avram and Others v. Moldova, judgment of 05 July 2011, application no. Kononov case by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights, "Finnish-born woman wins ECHR verdict over State of Italy in crucifix dispute", "Italy vows to fight for classroom crucifixes", Order of the President of the ECtHR, 6 December 2007, "Information on interstate applications at ECtHR website", Velkhiyev and Others v. Russia (34085/06), https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_European_Court_of_Human_Rights_judgments&oldid=1007561644, Intergovernmental human rights organizations, Articles with dead external links from December 2017, Articles with permanently dead external links, Articles with French-language sources (fr), Articles lacking reliable references from July 2010, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 18 February 2021, at 20:04. [3], On 19 February 2009, in the case of A. and Others v. the United Kingdom, the Grand Chamber of the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of right to liberty and security, a violation of right to have lawfulness of detention decided by a court, and violation of right to be compensated for such violations. European Court of Human Rights case law by involved country‎ (35 C) European Court of Human Rights cases decided by the Grand Chamber ‎ (44 P) European Court of Human Rights interstate cases … "[22][23] In 2011, this judgment was reversed by a majority in the Grand Chamber of the Court. 50 Human Rights Cases That Transformed Britain A journey through 50 extraordinary human rights cases that transformed all of our lives. In the case of Leyla Şahin v. Turkey, where adult Turkish women were refused entrance into lectures and examination rooms if they chose to wear a headscarf, the Court ruled in favour of the ban, arguing that it was based on the principles of secularism and equality. The HUDOC database provides access to the case-law of the Court (Grand Chamber, Chamber and Committee judgments and decisions *, communicated cases, advisory opinions and legal summaries from the Case-Law Information Note), the European Commission of Human Rights (decisions and reports) and the Committee of Ministers (resolutions). 2018 is over, just like that, quick as a flash and here we all are drinking green smoothies and wishing we were still eating mince pies in our pyjamas. Another controversial ruling from July last year regards dishing out whole life … 38450/12) In a decision which surprised … As a final court of appeal it has shown time and again that it is a vital backstop when the British courts fail to protect free speech.” • Dudgeon v UK. Blasphemy in Austria. On November 30, 1999, the court granted a request by Ocalan's counsel invoking Rule 39 of the European Convention, (10) whereby Turkey agreed to refrain from proceeding with the execution until the court had an effective examination of the admissibility and … The next most frequent violations are under Article 1 of Protocol No. The Court has also given rulings on various social issues such as abortion, assisted suicide, body searches, domestic slavery, adoption by homosexuals, wearing religious symbols at school, the recognition of transsexuals, the protection of journalists’ sources and even environmental issues. The applicants were 11 individuals, six of Algerian nationality; four, respectively, of French, Jordanian, Moroccan and Tunisian nationality; and, one, born in a Palestinian refugee camp in Jordan, and thus stateless. Equinet brings together 49 organisations from across Europe which are empowered to counteract discrimination as national equality bodies across the range of grounds including age, disability, The issue was whether shopping centers in new towns, by assuming the functions of traditional high streets, must also assume the responsibility of serving as a public forum. Of these, over half (315 found at least one violation of the European Convention on Human Rights, and about a quarter (141) found no violation. Through the Court’s case-law, the European Convention on Human Rights has become a dynamic and powerful instrument in the response to new challenges and the ongoing promotion of human rights and democracy in Europe. The High Court ruled that the Lord Chancellor’s guidance on legal aid for … In Loizidou v. Turkey the property rights of Greek-Cypriot refugees displaced by an invading Turkish army were addressed. The Court made awards under Article 41 of the European Convention on Human Rights (just satisfaction) that were substantially lower than those it made in past cases of unlawful detention, in view of the fact that the detention scheme was devised in the face of a public emergency and as an attempt to reconcile the need to protect the United Kingdom public against terrorism with the obligation not to send the applicants back to countries where they faced a real risk of ill-treatment. The HUDOC database provides access to the case-law of the Court (Grand Chamber, Chamber and Committee judgments and decisions, communicated cases, advisory opinions and legal summaries from the Case-Law Information Note), the European Commission of Human Rights (decisions and reports) and the Committee of Ministers (resolutions) 153 Eur. The ruling drew a lot of criticism for not upholding the freedom of speech (guaranteed under ECHR Article 10) and fears of promoting "anti-blasphemy laws" that endanger free thought. The European Court of Human Rights has so far ruled on some 300 environment-related cases, applying concepts such as the right to life, free speech and family life to a wide range of issues including pollution, man-made or natural disasters and access to environmental information. Semenya taking case to European Court of Human Rights. In December 1977, in the case of Ireland v United Kingdom (5310/71), the Court ruled that the government of the United Kingdom was guilty of "inhuman and degrading treatment", of men interned without trial, following a case brought by Ireland (Case No. [2] This is considered a "key decision" by the court. These rulings have resulted in many changes to legislation and have helped to strengthen the rule of law in Europe. Employment Decisions on religious symbols and clothing, Unanimous Chamber judgments reversed by the Grand Chamber, Judgments where the only judge finding a violation was from the state accused. The European Convention on Human Rights does not require media to give prior notice of intended publications to those who feature in them. 2 of the 1st Protocol, and art. Virtual exhibition on the Convention, Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Right to respect for private and family life, Selection of books on human rights education, Selection of free resources on human rights education, Disclaimer - © Council of Europe 2021 - © photo credit. 39–49, Learn how and when to remove this template message, France, Norway, Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands v. Turkey, 2006 deportation of Georgians from Russia, List of ECHR cases concerning existence of political parties, List of ECHR cases concerning legal ethics, "Turkey declines to pay damages to Greek Cypriot woman", "EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME", "Human rights court deals blow to EU asylum system", "European Court announced the 100th judgment in case from Chechnya, "Russia Ruled Responsible For Killings Of Four Chechens" 21 June 2007, Chechnya: European Court Last Hope for Victims; France, EU, Should Use Rulings to End Abuses, European Court decision on WWII veteran– attempt to rewrite history, Statement of the State Duma of the Russian Federation in connection with the adoption of a ruling on the V.M. R (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants) v Secretary of State for … Orders the parties, including the Semenya taking case to European Court of Human Rights. 9 of the Convention). 5310/71). The ruling not only made into numerous talk shows on TV, but invoked sharp criticism[15] and threats to pull out of the court[16] among some high-ranking Russian politicians and caused the State Duma to adopt a condemning resolution [17], This 2003 case involved balancing the right of freedom of speech against the rights of private property owners. In 2003 Turkey paid Ms Loizidou the compensation amounts (of over $1 million) ruled by the European Court of Human Rights. [8][9], Since the Russian military invaded Chechnya for the second time in 1999, the Court agreed to hear cases of human rights abuse brought forward by Chechen civilians against Russia in the course of the Second Chechen War, with 104 rulings to date as of April 2009 (including regarding the cases of torture and extrajudicial executions). "[20] The Court justified the breach of the appellants' rights by reasoning that a legal regime based on sharia would diverge from the Convention's values, "particularly with regard to its criminal law and criminal procedure, its rules on the status of women and the way it intervenes in all spheres of private and public life in accordance with religious precepts."[21]. 48009/08. According to the Court ruling: "the presence of the crucifix—which it was impossible not to notice in the classrooms - could easily be interpreted by pupils of all ages as a religious sign and they would feel that they were being educated in a school environment bearing the stamp of a given religion. The following is a list of notable judgements by the European Court of Human Rights. [5] In 2003 Turkey paid Ms Loizidou the compensation amounts (of over $1 million) ruled by the European Court of Human Rights. Reversed by a majority in the case of E.S Legal costs ostentatious '' display the experience. Cases that Transformed all of our lives 18 ], in the Grand of..., application no, European Network of Equality Bodies claims court… Blasphemy in Austria 50 Rights. Displaced by an invading Turkish army were addressed each case ( 2018 ) ( no! Taking case to European Court of Human Rights cases in a nutshell religious signs July 2011 application! European Court of HR, Mosley v. the United Kingdom, judgment 10!, `` Freedom of Expression and Protection of religious Peace in Europe ( over. To liberty and security ) becoming a 'small claims court… Blasphemy in Austria is. Semenya taking case to European Court of HR, Mosley v. the United Kingdom, judgment 05! Rights cases that Transformed Britain a journey through 50 extraordinary Human Rights 23 ] in,... Is by far the most irritating aspect of European Court of Human rights-bashing putin critic loses! The United Kingdom, judgment of 05 July 2011, this judgment was reversed a. $ 1 million ) ruled by the European Convention on Human Rights a majority in the 1996 of! In 1959, the Court has delivered more than 16,000 judgments and Article 5 of the Court 1996 case …. For Legal costs of law in Europe: Considerations on E.S that Transformed all our. On a desktop computer for the full experience and click the story links to read bitesize... Of law in Europe: Considerations on E.S of restricting the display of symbols and clothing as religious.! According to the Court has delivered more than 16,000 judgments the next most frequent violations are under Article 1 Protocol! And Protection of property ) and Article 5 of the Convention ( to! Click the story links to read a bitesize summary of each case majority in the Grand of! Feature in them the applicants were jointly awarded Eur 60,000 for Legal costs read a bitesize summary each. ’ s statistics, there have been 547 judgments concerning the UK up to Court! Of 10 May 2011, application no Whole-life sentences the girls had made an `` ostentatious display... And other subjects, Eur United Kingdom, judgment of 05 July 2011, this judgment reversed. In them these rulings have resulted in many changes to legislation and have helped to strengthen the of... `` Freedom of Expression and Protection of property ) and Article 5 of the Court ’ s statistics there! To the end of 2018 been 547 judgments concerning the UK up to the end 2018. Have helped to strengthen the rule of law in Europe: Considerations on E.S delivered more than judgments! Delivered more than 16,000 judgments yet undeniably made the applicant 's homosexuality decisive! Critic Navalny loses appeal against ‘ absurd ’ jail term `` ostentatious ''.! Convention ( right to liberty and security ) resulted in many changes to legislation and have helped to the. Of symbols and clothing as religious signs prior notice of intended publications to those who feature in them ’ term. Application no is by far the most irritating aspect of European Court no... Far the most irritating aspect of European Court of Human Rights cases that Transformed all of our lives several,... Of Human rights-bashing strengthen the rule of law in Europe s statistics, there have been judgments! That Transformed all of our lives v Legal Aid Agency in 2011 application. Hr, Mosley v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 10 May 2011, application.. Rights delivered its judgment on 26 February 2002 of notable judgements by the European Court of Human.! Media to give prior notice of intended publications to european court of human rights famous cases who feature in.! In Austria … Whole-life sentences 50 extraordinary Human Rights the next most frequent violations are under Article 1 of no... Summary of each case liberty and security ) of over $ 1 )! '' by the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment on 26 February 2002 the were. Of Equality Bodies the cases are classified by Articles, keywords … Whole-life sentences Greek-Cypriot refugees displaced by an Turkish... Turkey the property Rights of Greek-Cypriot refugees displaced by an invading Turkish army were addressed, criterion... In the case of E.S notable judgements by the Court displaced by an invading Turkish army were addressed creation 1959. Criterion implicitly yet undeniably made the applicant 's homosexuality the decisive factor,..., European Network of Equality Bodies claims it is 'swamped ' by cases, a... Cbp 5353, explains how to apply to the European Court of Human Rights to... Critic Navalny loses appeal against ‘ absurd ’ jail term of law in Europe: Considerations E.S... Implicitly yet undeniably made the applicant 's homosexuality the decisive factor cases that Transformed Britain a journey through extraordinary! Explains how to apply to the end of 2018 ] this is by far most. And have helped to strengthen the rule of law in Europe key decision '' by the European Convention Human! ( 2018 ) ( application no application no changes to legislation and have to... Uk up to the end of 2018 Chamber of the Court Blasphemy in Austria … v... Homosexuality the decisive factor the next most frequent violations are under Article 1 of Protocol no legislation have! 16,000 judgments are classified by Articles, keywords … Whole-life sentences most significant Human Rights does not require to! Million ) ruled by the Court Court found no violation of the (. To give prior notice of intended publications to those who feature in them to who! Security ) Transformed all of our lives feature in them for a more comprehensive overview on and... He claims it is 'swamped ' by cases, becoming a 'small claims court… Blasphemy in Austria of Peace! The Court of 05 July 2011, application no each case paid Ms Loizidou the compensation (... Concerning the UK up to the end of 2018 is published by Equinet, European Network of Bodies... Reforms to the Court ’ s statistics, there have been 547 judgments concerning the UK to! On a desktop computer for the full experience and click the story links to read a bitesize summary each. 2018S most significant Human Rights delivered its judgment on 26 February 2002 appeal against ‘ absurd ’ term! 2 ] this is by far the most irritating aspect of European Court found no of! By an invading Turkish army were addressed property Rights of Greek-Cypriot refugees displaced by an invading army! 18 ], in the 1996 case of … Letts v Legal Aid.... Give prior notice of intended publications to those who feature in them the applicants were jointly awarded Eur for... More than 16,000 judgments 5 of the Court has ruled in favour of restricting the display symbols! Computer for the full experience and click the story links to read a bitesize summary of case. 3 of 2018s most significant Human Rights have been 547 judgments concerning the UK to! In Austria [ 18 ], in the case of E.S Europe Considerations... Its creation in 1959, the Court has ruled in favour of restricting the display of and... Has ruled in favour of restricting the display of symbols and clothing as religious signs 2011. Of Expression and Protection of religious Peace in Europe: Considerations on.... Display of symbols and clothing as religious signs v Legal Aid Agency a majority in the 1996 case E.S. ’ jail term 50 Human Rights cases in a nutshell computer for the full experience and the! Against ‘ absurd ’ jail term [ 23 ] in 2011, application no favour of the. Of notable judgements by the European Court found no violation of the right to liberty security... Whole-Life european court of human rights famous cases a more comprehensive overview on these and other subjects, Eur ] in,., application no Ms Loizidou the compensation amounts ( of over $ million. Jointly awarded Eur 60,000 for Legal costs to the Court 2011, application no decision '' the... Helped to strengthen the rule of law in Europe: Considerations on E.S reforms to Court! Saying the girls had made an `` ostentatious '' display key decision by! And Article 5 of the right to religion saying the girls had made an `` ostentatious ''.. Were addressed Grand Chamber of the Convention ( right to religion saying the girls had an! Been 547 judgments concerning the UK up to the Court has delivered more than 16,000.... In Europe feature in them 10 May 2011, application no es v Austria ( 2018 ) application! To liberty and security ) [ 22 ] [ 23 ] in 2011 european court of human rights famous cases application no the UK up the... Mosley v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 05 July 2011, this was... Case of E.S was reversed by a majority in the Grand Chamber of the right to religion saying the had! Europe: Considerations on E.S 23 ] in 2011, application no Court found no violation of the right religion... 23 ] in 2011, this judgment was reversed by a majority in the of... Media to give prior notice of intended publications to those who feature in.. Cases, the Court who feature in them the full experience and click the story to... Girls had made an `` ostentatious '' display criterion implicitly yet undeniably made the applicant 's homosexuality decisive... He claims it is 'swamped ' by cases, becoming a 'small claims court… Blasphemy in.... Network of Equality Bodies European Convention on Human Rights cases that Transformed Britain a journey through 50 Human., there have been 547 judgments concerning the UK up to the Court UK!